Пропал сайт bookfi.org
Пропал сайт bookfi.org
Уважаемые товарищи! Подскажите, что стало с bookfi.org
Много чего там находил, есть ли какие-то альтернативы ему?
Много чего там находил, есть ли какие-то альтернативы ему?
Re: Пропал сайт bookfi.org
Код: Выделить всё
Зеркала http://bookzz.org/ , http://libgen.org/ , http://gen.lib.rus.ec/ , периодически то одно, то другое не работает. Форум http://genofond.org/"Я не видел людей страшней, чем толпа цвета хаки"
Re: Пропал сайт bookfi.org
Либген переехал в Индию.
Код: Выделить всё
http://genofond.org/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=7617
Последний раз редактировалось antabu Ср янв 21, 2015 8:49 am, всего редактировалось 1 раз.
"Я не видел людей страшней, чем толпа цвета хаки"
Re: Пропал сайт bookfi.org
Случайно обнаружил причины переезда любимого ресурса:
Финансовая цензура крепчает! Хочется верить, норвежское подданство нашего форума исключает подобные наезды...
Код: Выделить всё
http://www.google.com/transparencyreport/removals/copyright/domains/libgen.org/#!-
Sciencemadness
- Сообщения: 1334
- Зарегистрирован: Вс окт 18, 2009 11:12 am
Re: Пропал сайт bookfi.org
It doesn't look good
:
Код: Выделить всё
http://torrentfreak.com/elsevier-cracks-down-on-pirated-scientific-articles-150609/Re: Пропал сайт bookfi.org
Tom Allen, President of the Association of American Publishers (AAP), informs TF that websites such as Libgen pose a threat to the quality of scientific publications, as well as the public health.
“Scholarly publishers work to ensure the accuracy of the scientific record by issuing corrections and revisions to research findings as needed; Libgen typically does not,” Allen says. “As a result, its repository of illegally obtained content poses a threat to both quality journal publishing and to public health and safety.”
What an incredible hypocrisy!

“Scholarly publishers work to ensure the accuracy of the scientific record by issuing corrections and revisions to research findings as needed; Libgen typically does not,” Allen says. “As a result, its repository of illegally obtained content poses a threat to both quality journal publishing and to public health and safety.”
What an incredible hypocrisy!
Re: Пропал сайт bookfi.org
Код: Выделить всё
http://libgen.in/- uchebnik fiziki
- Сообщения: 4265
- Зарегистрирован: Пн авг 20, 2012 9:04 pm
Re: Пропал сайт bookfi.org
Кто бы сомневался, что именно Эльзевир это сделает.
Свобода, равенство, братство.
Или смерть.
Или смерть.
Re: Пропал сайт bookfi.org
Известно о случае участия в таком мероприятии Дж. Вайли с сынками.
Re: Пропал сайт bookfi.org
Упреждающее мероприятие команды либгена - периодическое открытие всё новых зеркал. А пользователям приходится отслеживать.
"Я не видел людей страшней, чем толпа цвета хаки"
Re: Пропал сайт bookfi.org
libgen все?
Re: Пропал сайт bookfi.org
Код: Выделить всё
http://libgen.biz/Re: Пропал сайт bookfi.org
Elsevier is seeking “injunctive relief”, costs and damages against the people and/or organisations running these sites. They claim that they have suffered, and continue to suffer, “irreparable harm” as a result of the actions of these sites. In practice, “injunctive relief” means the court ordering the take-down of the sites in question by whatever means possible.
This may prove easier said than done given that Sci-Hub is registered and operated out of St Petersburg, Russia, ostensibly by Alexandra Elbakyan. Libgen may be an easier target as their server is currently located in Amsterdam. Blocking domain names is only a temporary measure at best and it is extremely unlikely that they would be able to persuade the operator(s) of Sci-Hub or Libgen to turn up in court in the US.
One should possibly set aside too much concern over the irreparable harm that these sites may be causing Elsevier. Last year, Reed Elsevier, the parent company reported profits of $1.27 billion. Erik Engstrom, Reed Elsevier’s CEO was remunerated US $7 million in 2012. As in most instances of piracy, it is a fallacy to believe that those people who pirated content would have paid if that content was not available. In this case, they would simply have used the content that was openly available from other sources. So reasonably one would assume that it would be difficult for Elsevier to prove that they have suffered financially as a consequence of the piracy.
Elsevier has also become extremely unpopular with a large number of academics who argue that the license fees that Elsevier charges academic institutions are crippling and that Elsevier as an organisation acts against the free exchange of information. Over 15,000 academics have signed a protest against Elsevier through a site called the The Cost of Knowledge. Many of these academics are refusing to publish in, or perform editing duties for, Elsevier publications.
This may prove easier said than done given that Sci-Hub is registered and operated out of St Petersburg, Russia, ostensibly by Alexandra Elbakyan. Libgen may be an easier target as their server is currently located in Amsterdam. Blocking domain names is only a temporary measure at best and it is extremely unlikely that they would be able to persuade the operator(s) of Sci-Hub or Libgen to turn up in court in the US.
One should possibly set aside too much concern over the irreparable harm that these sites may be causing Elsevier. Last year, Reed Elsevier, the parent company reported profits of $1.27 billion. Erik Engstrom, Reed Elsevier’s CEO was remunerated US $7 million in 2012. As in most instances of piracy, it is a fallacy to believe that those people who pirated content would have paid if that content was not available. In this case, they would simply have used the content that was openly available from other sources. So reasonably one would assume that it would be difficult for Elsevier to prove that they have suffered financially as a consequence of the piracy.
Elsevier has also become extremely unpopular with a large number of academics who argue that the license fees that Elsevier charges academic institutions are crippling and that Elsevier as an organisation acts against the free exchange of information. Over 15,000 academics have signed a protest against Elsevier through a site called the The Cost of Knowledge. Many of these academics are refusing to publish in, or perform editing duties for, Elsevier publications.
Код: Выделить всё
https://genofond.org/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=104&p=65446#p65446
https://theconversation.com/elsevier-acts-against-research-article-pirate-sites-and-claims-irreparable-harm-43293Re: Пропал сайт bookfi.org
Жадность фраера сгубила?
Re: Пропал сайт bookfi.org
уже не оченьgeizerr писал(а):живКод: Выделить всё
http://libgen.biz/
Код: Выделить всё
http://gen.lib.rus.ec/Re: Пропал сайт bookfi.org
Код: Выделить всё
http://libgen.education/Re: Пропал сайт bookfi.org
на данным момент нетHelлен писал(а):этот рабочийКод: Выделить всё
http://libgen.education/
Re: Пропал сайт bookfi.org
У них твиттер есть, обычно там технические проблемы отслеживаю
http://twitter.com/libgen_project
http://twitter.com/libgen_project
Re: Пропал сайт bookfi.org
Либген вернулся. Надолго ли?
Код: Выделить всё
http://libgen.io/-
Sciencemadness
- Сообщения: 1334
- Зарегистрирован: Вс окт 18, 2009 11:12 am
Re: Пропал сайт bookfi.org
"Court Orders Shutdown of Libgen, Bookfi and Sci-Hub
A New York District Court has granted Elsevier's request for a preliminary injunction against several sites that host academic publications without permission. As a result the site's operators are now ordered to quit offering access to infringing content, while the associated registries must suspend their domain names. "
A New York District Court has granted Elsevier's request for a preliminary injunction against several sites that host academic publications without permission. As a result the site's operators are now ordered to quit offering access to infringing content, while the associated registries must suspend their domain names. "
Код: Выделить всё
https://torrentfreak.com/court-orders-shutdown-of-libgen-bookfi-and-sci-hub-151102/Кто сейчас на конференции
Сейчас этот форум просматривают: нет зарегистрированных пользователей и 15 гостей